2A). Due to the fact examples, STETHOSCOPE (Meters = step one.333), EMPEROR (Yards = step one.407), and you will Castle (Yards = 1.579) was indeed ranked among the the very least repeated signs within the ASL-LEX, and you can H2o (Yards = six.963), You (Meters = 6.889), and you can Me (Meters = 6.76) was ranked one of the most repeated signs.
We conducted a comparison of subjective frequency estimates from ASL-LEX and another independent dataset that used the same 1–7 rating scale for ASL signs, although the ratings were from deaf ASL signers residing in Canada (). We verified that a total of 297 items shared the same sign form in both datasets. The raw frequency ratings in the two datasets were moderately correlated (r s = 0.65, p < .001), suggesting good external validity. We also conducted a cross-linguistic comparison between raw subjective frequency estimates for a subset of 226 ASL and BSL signs from Vinson et al. (2008) that had translation equivalents in English (same rating scale). The results revealed a moderate correlation (r s = 0.52, p < .001), suggesting that signs expressing similar concepts in two different sign languages (evidenced by the same English translation) tend to receive similar frequency estimates. Using Fisher's r-to-z transformation, we found that the ASL-ASL correlation was stronger than the ASL-BSL correlation (z = 2.24, p = 0.0251). In addition, raw frequency ratings were moderately correlated with log10 word frequencies of their English translations from SUBTLEXUs (r s = 0.58, p < .001). The ASL-ASL correlation did not statistically differ from the ASL-English correlation (z = 1.69, p = 0.091).
Amazingly, Bates mais aussi al. (2003) found comparable lexical regularity correlations one of eight verbal dialects (Imply roentgen = .51; SD = .079), inside typologically diverse languages particularly English and you can Mandarin Chinese (r = .53). Bates ainsi que al. (2003) hypothesize the relatively higher consistency out-of feedback across the dialects get feel related to shared cultural feel. This will be a likely cause to your discovering that contained in this a comparable language and/or community (ASL-ASL; ASL-English), the fresh new relationship are more powerful than all over dialects and you will countries (ASL-BSL). There is concepts that will be a whole lot more culturally relevant to deaf organizations in addition to their spoken equivalents for the North america than in brand new United kingdom, and this you certainly will dictate new frequency that specific terms/cues are utilized in the for every single words, also participants’ familiarity with new maxims on their own.
Iconicity product reviews were skewed into budget of measure (Fig. 2B), appearing that cues found in ASL-LEX was basically fundamentally considered to has reduced iconicity beliefs. While we picked the latest cues into goal of reaching a normal volume shipment, contra Vinson mais aussi al. (2008) we failed to come across cues having a goal iconicity shipment (we.elizabeth., especially shopping for signs at each other ends of your own iconicity distribution). Our very own efficiency ergo mean that lexicalized ASL signs is off lower iconicity whenever frequency often is distributed. Book (Suggest Iconicity = 6.684) and ZIPPER (Yards = 6.394) are among the extremely legendary signs in ASL-LEX, and you will Last night (M = step one.086) and you can Sluggish (M = step one.567) are among the minimum iconic cues.
This new delivery away from phonological features is seen when you look at the Fig. step 3. The “neutral” lesser area try more constant (N = 345), next five common cities was indeed palm (Letter = 92), other Footnote cuatro (N = 76), jaw (N = 60) and you may eye (Letter = 60). The remainder twenty-eight minor metropolises was basically depicted by 50 otherwise a lot fewer signs. The costs regarding slight urban centers come into the main.csv document during the OSF (
Volume delivery away from phonological services inside the ASL-LEX. For chose fingers, yards = middle fist, r = ring finger victoria milan beoordeling, p = pinky, i = directory little finger. Having Signal Style of, HS = handshape
Comment (0)